<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.proscholar.org/jcis</provider_url><author_name>webcontempo</author_name><author_url>https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/author/webcontempo/</author_url><title>Volume 5, issue 1, pp. 29-33 - Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="4ljB3yZ1RL"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/publications/vol.5/iss.1/6/"&gt;Volume 5, issue 1, pp. 29-33&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/publications/vol.5/iss.1/6/embed/#?secret=4ljB3yZ1RL" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Volume 5, issue 1, pp. 29-33&#x201D; &#x2014; Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery" data-secret="4ljB3yZ1RL" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Introduction. Although numerous surgical closure methods have been proposed for the treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease (PSD), the ideal treatment method has not yet been identified due to high recurrence rates. The objective of this study is to compare the closure technique that uses traditional post-pilonidal sinus excision Primary Repair (PR) method with closure technique [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
