<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.proscholar.org/jcis</provider_url><author_name>webcontempo</author_name><author_url>https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/author/webcontempo/</author_url><title>Volume 5, issue 1, pp. 39-42 - Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="DQvwYbSWKz"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/publications/vol.5/iss.1/8/"&gt;Volume 5, issue 1, pp. 39-42&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/publications/vol.5/iss.1/8/embed/#?secret=DQvwYbSWKz" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Volume 5, issue 1, pp. 39-42&#x201D; &#x2014; Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery" data-secret="DQvwYbSWKz" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Aim. Pelvic organ prolapse negatively affects the women&#x2019;s quality of life and often require surgical treatment. There are several therapeutic options for pelvic organ prolapse. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life in patients with pelvic organ prolapse treated by either sacrospinous ligament fixation or LeFort colpocleisis. Materials and Methods. [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
