<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.proscholar.org/jcis</provider_url><author_name>webcontempo</author_name><author_url>https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/author/webcontempo/</author_url><title>Volume 5, issue 2, pp. 96-99 - Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="TQJmtGsoQG"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/publications/vol.5/iss.2/7/"&gt;Volume 5, issue 2, pp. 96-99&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/publications/vol.5/iss.2/7/embed/#?secret=TQJmtGsoQG" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Volume 5, issue 2, pp. 96-99&#x201D; &#x2014; Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery" data-secret="TQJmtGsoQG" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Objective. Demonstration of the advantages of using the natural Y shaped form of saphenous vein graft, which is the most preferred coronary bypass graft after internal thoracic artery (ITA). Methods. 32 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary bypass grafting (CABG) with 3 or more distal anastomoses between January 2014 and January 2018 were [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
